Harry Carter
Carter Home
2001 Archives
2000 Archives
Other Columnists
EMS: Sirenhead
Steve Austin
Frank Brannigan
Dennis Smith
Top News
Today's Headlines
EMS Headlines
Sections
In the Line of Duty
Wildfire Central
Funding & FIRE Act
HotShots &
  Photostories

World of Fire
Features
NewsTicker
E-Newsletters
PagerNews
Submit Stories



Updated: Thursday, November 14 - 3 PM
Home --> Carter Commentary --> Column

  E-Mail this page
to a friend/co-worker



Harry Carter Commentary
Trouble Across America

HARRY R. CARTER, Ph.D., MIFireE

carter

Let me reach back into the world of the 1950’s for inspiration. A lyric from Meredith Wilson’s classic musical, The Music Man, sets the tone for this week’s visit with you. "There’s trouble in River City." And trust me folks, the trouble I am talking about starts with a "Capital T."

All is not well in the American Fire Service. From the volume, tone, and tenor of my e-mails, the troubles abound on both sides of the fence. Whether a department is career or volunteer, makes no difference. As you have seen in this column over the past few weeks, the problems just keep coming. Regardless of which region we discuss, the indicators portray a decidedly downward trend.

I am going to take a point of personal privilege this week. I am going to dedicate this column to my brother firefighters laboring in the vineyards of the Newark Fire Department. Recent events in New Jersey’s largest city have taken a downward spiral and accelerated the out-off-control spin.

This past Wednesday night, I attended a watershed event in the history of the City of Newark. In a burst of unanimity the Newark Professional Fire Officers Union and the Newark Fireman’s Union held a joint meeting to protest their treatment by the city’s administration. A recent fire that sent over forty firefighters for medical attention brought the long simmering problems within the department to a heavy boil.

Recently a very large blaze struck the city’s North Ward area, near the Passaic River. An abandoned Superfund factory site caught fire and flames roared into the night air. Over the course of that June evening, five alarm’s worth of dedicated effort went into controlling the inferno. But the real problems did not begin until a couple of days after the fire. A buddy of mine who was at the fire told me that he had not seen such a wide array of multi-colored flames in his 34 years as a firefighter. For the uninitiated, this truly represents a fire with lots of chemicals.

A number of firefighters were taken to area hospitals with respiratory problems. A number of them were sent home with inhalers to assist their breathing. With the fire long out, and the members dispersed to their homes for some well-earned time off, problems began.

Members of the shifts that had not been at the fire noted strange things beginning to happen to their apparatus and equipment. Any exposed metal on the fire apparatus, not covered by paint, had begun to rust. The metal attachment rings on the men’s accountability tags began to rust and corrode. Concerns began to rise about just what the troops might have been exposed to.

However, when the shift that worked the fire returned from their days off, no one had yet made a determination to have their turnout gear tested for contaminants. Air samples were taken by a local university in order to test for potential contaminants. Rubs were also taken from exposed gear and sent to a private laboratory by the Fireman’s Union.

As the former Commander of the Haz-Mat Team in Newark, these precipitating occurrences immediately set off the alarm bells in my mind. Having examined the equipment, I found stainless steel that appeared to my eyes to be pitted and corroded. Think about it gang. Stains on stainless steel. To me this meant one thing. These men and their equipment had been exposed to some form of acid, in an airborne form. This was confirmed by another associate who informed me that a litmus paper test of the runoff had tested acidic.

Not only did this explain the problems with the metal, it highlighted the urgency of the health problems being experienced by the members of the firefighting team. The introduction of acid into the lungs will irritate them and cause fluid to begin to build up. Yet the city has done nothing other than send some turnout gear to a testing agency and have an unnamed local expert test the air and say that there was no problem.

Another critical issue involves a lack of spare turnout gear and self-contained breathing apparatus. It’s not like there is a lack of precedent. Back on December 17,1998 more than forty firefighters and officers were exposed to toxic products during a fire at a major incinerator site in the city’s Ironbound neighborhood. Nothing was done to upgrade departmental capabilities at thiat time. And nothing has been done since.

Meanwhile, back at the Union Hall, the tension in the air was palpable, as the two unions sat down with more than 100 of their members to take a Vote of No Confidence in the city’s fire administration. This was a landmark interaction that has resulted from many years of neglect by the city.

Representatives from two major New York City television stations were in attendance as the charges against the city were read. I was there representing 1st Responder Newspaper and Firehouse.com. No medical alert has been issued, sufficient quantities of replacement turnout gear are still unavailable. And on and on the list went. And the litany of woes was most familiar to me, as every issue, other than the recent fire, dated back to my days in the department before I retired on June 1,1999.

In addition to the fire-related problems. the city’s new state-of-the art communications center was cited by the unions for reusing the 30-year old dispatch equipment that was formerly located in the old dispatch center in city hall. While the police received all new equipment, the old fire department equipment was transferred to the new center. The unions have also notified the state Public Employee Occupational Safety and Health Administration, that the city has yet to comply with the state law regarding medical monitoring.

Other issues that precipitated the Vote of No Confidence included:

  • Lack of certified supervisions – supervisor ranks at the company officer level in the department are down by a figure of 25 percent.
  • The department has yet to comply with the New Jersey State requirement to provide medical monitoring and rehabilitation support at fires and other emergencies.
  • Lack of proper maintenance support, with many units going without such simple things as oil changes for more than six months in many cases.
  • Aerial ladders were only recently inspected after a firefighter was almost killed when a ladder rotated out of control trapping him above electrical wires. This incident occurred during a fire prevention week demonstration for a group of children. (I know this to be most true as pumps and ladders were never tested during my time on the department.) This is particularly troublesome, given the fact that a close personal friend was electrocuted back in 1994 while operating off of an aerial near power lines)
  • Fire station living conditions are atrocious. Some stations are without heat in the winter and air conditioning in the summer. Broken windows abound, and raw sewerage runs in the basements of a number of stations.

    Folks, it is extremely difficult for me to report on this issue in a totally unbiased manner. Too many deep and abiding personal friends were directly affected by the events at the fire in late June. Heck, my own brother, Bob Carter is still the Chief in Battalion Four on my old shift. He is in command of one of the four shifts in the city’s busiest fire area.

    Let me assure you that many of the issues that precipitated this unprecedented Vote of No Confidence have been simmering since I was a rookie firefighter more than 27 years ago. And they have yet to be addressed. While I am sure that there may be those who fail to see how an act such as this vote could occur, I offer the thought that desperate people will take desperate measures to draw attention to their plight. The vote was taken immediately after the reading of those charges against the city. The vote was unanimous among those in the packed union auditorium. And the story was a lead story on those television stations that covered the event.

    Now let us take a broader view of the issue of poor municipal support for fire departments. While I have chosen to focus on Newark, other firefighters across the United States and Canada are suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous municipal persecution.

    During the past week the following events have occurred:

  • Firefighters in Rutland, Vermont picketed city hall to protest a short fall of personnel. Six members retired, and rather than hire replacements, the city decided to ride short-handed. Now six people may not seem to be a great number of people, but in this case it was a reduction of 20 percent according to sources requesting anonymity. And apparently the new chief said that they could do the job without the missing people. (Doesn’t anybody read anymore? The Fire Protection Handbook from the National Fire Protection Association still recommends a force of 12 people under a Chief officer, operating a force of two engines and an aerial device, or unit capable of performing truck work. And this is for a detached single family residence at that)
  • Firefighters in Fitchburg, Massachusetts are fighting layoffs that would take their second aerial ladder out of service. This is a beautiful battle, at least for me to watch, because off newspaper stories that speak of the mayor and city council members fighting over this issue. One council member said that he would never vote for any cuts that took the aerial ladder from his constituents and himself.
  • Firefighters and the City of Houston are still battling the issue of 3 member crews on their engine and aerial ladders. The Fire Chief is a strong advocate for the existing four-member crews, but the battle between the department and the bean counters is not going well.

    The interesting thing in the Houston battle involves the fact that the union had been operating under a special arrangement that provided that its members would work at straight time, rather than at the time and a half rate to maintain the four-person staffing. That was a significant saving to the city, each time a member worked under that plan. But I guess that it did amount to a hill of beans to the counters, at least not as big a hill as cutting down to three members per crew. Correct me if I am wrong, but didn’t Houston lose two firefighters to line-of-duty deaths this year. Once again we see the Worcester Syndrome. Take six dead, add six months, and start cutting again.

    Now maybe there is a way that I can help our poor, hardworking adversaries in the bean counting world my Webmaster offers the following pension plan that he and his colleagues bandied about at a former communications giant, back in the early 1990’s.

    A New Pension Formula: Zero – Zero – One and Two

    Add zero to your years in service, add zero to your age, you have one month to get out, and you have to take two people with you.

    So there you have it folks. All is not well. And there’s "… trouble in River City." And that trouble is extending all across America. Ponder hard on that point.


    The commentary in this column does not necessarily reflect those of Firehouse.Com, Firehouse Magazine, their employees or parent company Cygnus Business Media.

    Harry R. Carter, Ph.D., MIFireE, is an internationally known municipal fire protection consultant and contributing editor to Firehouse Magazine. He recently retired as a Battalion Commander with the Newark, New Jersey Fire Department. His commentary appears regularly on Firehouse.Com. For more commentary and information, visit Carter's web site at www.harrycarter.com

    Harry has published several books available for online ordering, including Firefighting Strategy and Tactics and Management in the Fire Service

    Content © Copyright 2000 - 2002 Harry R. Carter, Ph.D., L.L.C.

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

    Register Now - Contact Us - Submit

    Privacy Policy - Terms of Use

    Best Viewed IE/Netscape 5+
    800x600 Screen Resolution or Highter

    Copyright(c) 1997-2002

    Advertising/Sponsorship Opportunities